Creative Commons License 2022 Volume 9 Issue 1

Evaluation of the Quality of Life of the Patients with Heart Failure in Ahvaz Teaching Hospitals


,
Abstract

In all cases, Heart Failure (HF) affects the mental health and consequently the QoL of patients to a varying extent. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of life of patients with heart failure in Ahvaz.  The present descriptive-analytical study was performed on 220 patients admitted to the cardiac ward of Golestan Hospital in Ahvaz during 2020. Sampling was not performed due to the limited statistical population. Data was collected using a 36-item QoL questionnaire after determining their validity and reliability. The data was analyzed by SPSS 22 software using analysis of variance, t-test, and Pearson correlation coefficient at a significance level of 0.05.

29.2%, 39%, and 8.31% of the subjects had good, moderate, and poor QoL. Men and women were different significantly in dimensions of general health and physical pain, with women having a lower QoL in these two subscales (P < 0.05). Subjects attained the lowest (16.1 ± 11.2) and the highest (41.1 ± 14.2) mean scores in physical problems and general health dimensions, respectively. QoL and mental health problems in HF patients necessitate conducting qualitative research on ways to improve QoL and mental health of these patients. Besides, comparative studies on these patients are necessary before and after implementing nursing models to care for and support HF patients.


How to cite this article
Vancouver
Nabavi SS, Gholizadeh B. Evaluation of the Quality of Life of the Patients with Heart Failure in Ahvaz Teaching Hospitals. Entomol Appl Sci Lett. 2022;9(1):26-30. https://doi.org/10.51847/MKWPCvwetC
APA
Nabavi, S. S., & Gholizadeh, B. (2022). Evaluation of the Quality of Life of the Patients with Heart Failure in Ahvaz Teaching Hospitals. Entomology and Applied Science Letters, 9(1), 26-30. https://doi.org/10.51847/MKWPCvwetC
Downloads: 102
Views: 621

Evaluation of the Quality of Life of the Patients with Heart Failure in Ahvaz Teaching Hospitals

Seyed Salaheddin Nabavi 1, Behnam Gholizadeh 2*

 

1 Department of General Surgery, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Ahvaz Anesthesiology, and Pain Research Center, School of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

2 Department of General Surgery, Golestan Hospital, Ahvaz Anesthesiology, and Pain Research Center, School of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.


ABSTRACT

In all cases, Heart Failure (HF) affects the mental health and consequently the QoL of patients to a varying extent. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of life of patients with heart failure in Ahvaz.  The present descriptive-analytical study was performed on 220 patients admitted to the cardiac ward of Golestan Hospital in Ahvaz during 2020. Sampling was not performed due to the limited statistical population. Data was collected using a 36-item QoL questionnaire after determining their validity and reliability. The data was analyzed by SPSS 22 software using analysis of variance, t-test, and Pearson correlation coefficient at a significance level of 0.05.

29.2%, 39%, and 8.31% of the subjects had good, moderate, and poor QoL. Men and women were different significantly in dimensions of general health and physical pain, with women having a lower QoL in these two subscales (P < 0.05). Subjects attained the lowest (16.1 ± 11.2) and the highest (41.1 ± 14.2) mean scores in physical problems and general health dimensions, respectively. QoL and mental health problems in HF patients necessitate conducting qualitative research on ways to improve QoL and mental health of these patients. Besides, comparative studies on these patients are necessary before and after implementing nursing models to care for and support HF patients.

Keywords: QoL, Mental health, Heart failure, Ahvaz.


INTRODUCTION

 

Cardiovascular diseases and related complications are some of the most important causes of death in industrialized and developing countries, including Iran [1], where conducted studies reported a prevalence of 2.32% for cardiovascular diseases [2]. HF is known as the common final consequence of all heart disorders [3]. The prevalence of this disease has increased, firstly, due to elevated life expectancy leading to an elevation in chronic diseases (e.g. chronic HF), and, secondly, because of progress in the treatment of heart disease [4]. A report by the American Heart Association indicates that about 3.7% of all deaths from cardiovascular diseases are caused by HF. By 2030, more than 3.23 million people are predicted to decease annually because of cardiovascular diseases [5], and the prevalence of HF to rise by 25% [6].

HF is often referred to as Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), i.e. the inability of the heart to pump sufficient blood to meet the needs of tissues for oxygen and nutrients [4]. The disease symptoms and the consequent complications gradually cause limitations in the routine lives of patients, thereby affecting their QoL [7]. Among heart diseases, HF equally overshadows patients’ mental, social, and psychological health and, consequently, their perception of health, in addition to the physical consequences. An elevated lifetime of HF patients along with the profound effects of this disease on their individual and social life and their families, as well as its chronic, progressive, and irreversible nature, are among the most important reasons for the decline in QoL of these patients. As such, most studies reported that the quality of life in patients with HF is lower than that of other chronic diseases [8-12]. Declined QoL not only hurts social, family, and work-life as well as on leisure activities but also increases the risk of hospitalization and death due to this disease; QoL, therefore, accounts for a predictor of HF consequences [13].

In addition to assisting ineffective treatment, access to QoL information also plays an important role in promoting support programs and rehabilitation measures [14]. QoL is an indicator of physical and social activities as well as mental health being considered as one of the important components of health. In all cases, HF affects the mental health and consequently the QoL of patients to a varying extent. The concept of QoL, mental health, and related factors in HF patients has been studied scarcely in Iran, and consequently, this group of patients have been less studied by psychological interventions. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the quality of life of patients with heart failure in Ahvaz. 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present descriptive-analytical study was performed on 220 HF patients admitted to the cardiovascular ward of Golestan Hospital in Ahvaz during 2020. The study population consisted of all HF patients hospitalized at the cardiovascular ward of Golestan Hospital in Ahvaz. Sampling was not performed due to the limited statistical population. Inclusion criteria were definitive diagnosis of HF (HF diagnosis in the patient's medical record), at least six months passed since the diagnosis of patients being hospitalized again for medical reasons, fluency in Persian, no mental retardation, and over 18 years of age. Data was collected using three demographics, SF-36 QoL, and GHQ-28 mental health questionnaires.

The SF-36 QoL questionnaire consists of 36 questions in eight subscales of physical function, physical limitation, physical pain, general health, vivacity, social functioning, mental problems, and mental health, which are classified into two scales of physical health and mental health. In other words, physical health comprises the total questions of subscales of physical function [9], physical limitation [4], physical pain [2], and general health [5]. Mental health also includes the total questions of subscales of social performance [2], mental problems [3], mental health [5], and vivacity [4]. One more question also examines a change in one’s health status compared with the previous year. The scores of each scale vary from zero to 100, with zero reporting the worst and 100 being the best in the intended scale [15].

Molavi confirmed its validity with r = 0.91 and reported reliability of 0.90 using Cronbach's alpha coefficient [16]. The data was analyzed by SPSS 22 software using descriptive statistics and analysis of variance (ANOVA), t-test, and Pearson correlation coefficient at a significance level of 0.05.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The distribution of frequency percentage of demographic characteristics for the subjects showed that 45% and 55% of the population were males and females, respectively. Married, single, and deceased spouses comprised 75%, 12%, 13% of the participants. Dropouts and above school diploma were recorded in 63% and 37% of the subjects, respectively. Participants with and without a history of hospitalization were 44% and 66%, respectively, and 64% and 36% had incomes below and above two million Tomans, respectively. The dimensions of QoL (mean ± standard deviation) are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Mean and Standard Deviation of Dimensions of Quality of Life

Standard Deviation

Mean

Dimension

Variables

41.3 ±14.2

31.1 ±13.3

16.1 ±11.2

33.3 ±14.8

32.1 ±10.1

39.5 ±11.6

37.3 ±20.1

40.4 ±17.2

General Health

Physical Function

Physical Problems

Mental Problems

Social Performance

Physical Pain

Cheerfulness

Mental Health

Quality of Life

According to Table 1, 29.2%, 39%, and 8.31% of the subjects had good, moderate, and poor QoL. Subjects attained the lowest (16.1 ± 11.2) and the highest (41.1 ± 14.2) mean scores in physical problems and general health dimensions, respectively. Table 2 represents the correlation between gender and the dimensions of QoL.

 

 

Table 2. Correlation between Gender and Dimensions of Quality of Life

P-Value

Gender

Dimension

Variable

Man

Female

Standard Deviation

Mean

Standard Deviation

Mean

*0.000

0.43

0.32

*0.005

0.33

*0.000

0.45

*0.003

11.3 ±4.6

20.1 ±5.1

16.1 ±3.2

2.3 ±7.3

9.3 ±5.3

10.1 ±1.6

12.4 ±15.1

11.3 ±11.2

11.1 ±1.2

11.1 ±2.3

6.5 ±3.1

5.3 ±4.8

15.1 ±10.2

9.4 ±9.6

7.3 ±5.6

12.6 ±8.2

General Health

Physical Function

Physical Problems

Mental Problems

Social Performance

Physical Pain

Cheerfulness

Mental Health

Quality of Life

             

 

 

As shown in Table 2, men and women were different significantly in dimensions of general health and physical pain, with women having a lower QoL in these two subscales (P < 0.05). However, the QoL of women in dimensions of mental problems and mental health was significantly higher than that of men (P < 0.05).

The findings of the present study showed that women comprised most of the studied patients, which is not in line with those of most studies [17-19], but it is consistent with a few limited studies in which the frequency of females was higher [20, 21]. Although HF is relatively less common in women, at least half of the cases occur in women because they have a longer life expectancy [22].

The present findings demonstrated moderate and low QoL in the majority of subjects, which corresponds to those of Phillip [23] and Gavin [24]. Phillip reported that most patients with HF described poor QoL, which could be attributed to limitations created in patients’ life, including the inability to perform many daily life activities compared with other people. Additionally, HF had the most negative effect on our patients' mental health, in particular on social functioning, which is in agreement with those of Mardani [25] and Salati [26]. Supportive resources in disease conditions are considered a high necessity for survival and adaptation, and heart patients living alone have a poor QoL [27]. Compared with other chronic diseases, HF leads to the destruction of one’s functional roles in social, family, and marital relationships and reduces job performance due to disabling complications and consequent severe limitations in life.

According to the research findings, there was a significant difference between the two dimensions of general health and physical pain between men and women. It was found that life stress and deprivation of emotional support put women with heart failure at greater risk of declining quality of life than men. Women have lower vitality and physical function than men, and this difference becomes more pronounced after one year of follow-up, because women are more likely than men to suffer from problems such as sleep disorders, emotional problems, decreased energy, strength, and illness [28].

CONCLUSION

The QoL of most subjects was at a moderate level. Therefore, the QoL problems in HF patients necessitate conducting qualitative research on ways to improve QoL of these patients. Besides, comparative studies on these patients are necessary before and after implementing nursing models to care for and support HF patients.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: We hereby thank the cooperation and participation of the staff of Golestan Hospital in collecting the data of the research project approved by the Vice-Chancellor for Research and Technology of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences with the ID IR.AJUMS.REC.1399.583.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None

FINANCIAL SUPPORT: None

ETHICS STATEMENT: None


References

1.       Moradi M, Daneshi F, Behzadmehr R, Rafiemanesh H, Bouya S, Raeisi M. Quality of life of chronic heart failure patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart Fail Rev. 2020;25(6):993-1006.

2.       Reddy YN, Rikhi A, Obokata M, Shah SJ, Lewis GD, AbouEzzedine OF, et al. Quality of life in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: importance of obesity, functional capacity, and physical inactivity. Eur J Heart Fail. 2020;22(6):1009-18.

3.       Alizadeh-Ghavidel A, Basiri H, Totonchi Z, Mirmesdagh Y, Jalili-Shahandashti F, Gholizadeh B. A rare presentation of late right coronary artery spasm following aortic valve replacement. ARYA Atheroscler. 2015;11(1):50-3.

4.       Gür AK, Şahinalp Ş, Unal H. Results of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery in Female Smokers and Female Patients who make Tandoori who had Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. East J Med. 2020;25(1):1-7.

5.       Virani SS, Alonso A, Benjamin EJ, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, Carson AP, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2020 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020;141(9):e139-596.

6.       Peighambari MM, Aryafar M, Mirmesdagh Y, Gholizadeh B, Hosseini S, Samiei N. Prevalence of atherosclerosis risk factors in patients with aortic stenosis. Iran Heart J. 2014;15(1):13-6.

7.       Friis K, Aaby A, Lasgaard M, Pedersen MH, Osborne RH, Maindal HT. Low health literacy and mortality in individuals with cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, and mental illness: a 6-year population-based follow-up study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(24):9399.‏

8.       Toth PP, Gauthier D. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: disease burden for patients, caregivers, and the health-care system. Postgrad Med.  2020:1-6.

9.       Fakhri A, Baboli M, Jahanbani E, Karamianpoor J, Binandeh M, Moradi-Joo E. The Relationship between Perfectionism, Personality Type A and Meta-cognition with Job Burnout in Staff of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences. Entomol Appl Sci Lett. 2020;7(2):26-34.

10.   Javaherforooshzadeh F, Abdalbeygi H, Janatmakan F, Gholizadeh B. Comparing the effects of ketorolac and Paracetamol on postoperative pain relief after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A randomized clinical trial. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020;15:1-8.

11.   Fakhri A, Hamedpour H, Pad Z, Hamedpour R, Moradi-Joo E, Binandeh M, et al. Exercise Effect on Anxiety and Depression among Kidney Transplant Patients. Entomol Appl Sci Lett. 2020;7(2):77-82.

12.   Rahnavard Z, Zolfaghari M, Kazemnejad A, Hatamipour K. An investigation of quality of life and factors affecting it in patients with congestive heart failure. Hayat. 2006;12(1):77-86.

13.   Abedi HA, Yasaman-Alipour M, Abdeyazdan G. Quality of Life in heart failure patients referred to the outpatient centers, 2010. J Shahrekord Univ Med Sci. 2011;13(5):55-63.

14.   Karami Salahodinkolah M, Pahlevan Sharif S, Sharif Nia H, Jafari H, Shafipour V. Relationship between Health Literacy and Quality of Life in Patients with Heart Failure. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2020;30(191):121-7.

15.   Kalfoss M, Abudayya A, Cvancarova Småstuen M. The relationship of existential well–being to identity, religious coping, mental and general health among Norwegian aging women. J Women Aging. 2020:1-5.

16.   Molavi H. Validity factor structure and reliability of the Farsi version of general health questionnaire 28 In Iranian students. J Psychol Res. 2004;2(17):30-40.

17.   Shuldham C, Theaker C, Jaarsma T, Cowie MR. Evaluation of the European Heart Failure Self-care Behaviour Scale in a United Kingdom population. J Adv Nurs. 2007;60(1):87-95.

18.   Shojafard J, Nadrian H, Baghiani Moghadam M, Mazlumi Mahmudabad S, Sanati H, Asgar Shahi M. Effects of an educational program on self-care behaviors and its perceived benefts and barriers in patients with Heart Failure in Tehran. Payavard Salamat. 2009;2(4):43-55.

19.   Heo S, Lennie TA, Okoli C, Moser DK. Quality of life in patients with heart failure: ask the patients. Heart Lung. 2009;38(2):100-8.

20.   Tai YH, Wu HL, Lin SP, Tsou MY, Chang KY. An investigation of the effect of patient-controlled analgesia on long-term quality of life after major surgery: A prospective cohort study. J Chin Med Assoc. 2020;83(2):194-201.

21.   Kashani AK, Kooshki S, Kazemi AS, Khoshli AK. Structural equation modeling of relationships between social support, self-efficacy, and quality of life in patients with heart failure. Int J Health Stud. 2020;6(3):29-34.

22.   Khoshab H. Study of the effect of partnership care model on the quality of life in patients with heart failure. Master of science, Kerman, Kerman Univ Med Sci. 2011.

23.   Phillip J, Gary W, Terina S, Harald B. The Real World Mental Health Needs of Heart Failure Patients Are Not Reflected by the Depression Randomized Controlled Trial Evidence. J PloS One. 2014;9(1):85-92.

24.   Gavin W, Dagmara H, Murray D. Health-related quality of life after renal denervation in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension. J Am Heart Assoc. 2012; 8(2):1479-85.

25.   Jenabi E, Gholamaliee B, Khazaei S. Correlation between Health Literacy and Quality of Life in Iranian Menopausal Women. J Menopausal Med. 2020;26(1):34-8.

26.   Salati M, Brunelli A, Xiumè F, Refai M, Sabbatini A. Quality of life in the elderly after major lung resection for lung cancer. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009;8(1):79-83.

27.   Luttik ML, Jaarsma T, Lesman I, Sanderman R, Hagedoorn M. Quality of life in partners of people with congestive heart failure: gender and involvement in care. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65(7):1442-51.

28.   Shih ML, Tsai ST, Chen HM, Chou FH, Liu Y. Gender differences? Factors related to quality of life among patients with Heart failure. Women Health. 2020;60(4):382-95.


 


Entomology and Applied Science Letters is an international double-blind peer reviewed publication which publishes scientific research & review articles related to insects that contain information of interest to a wider audience, e.g. papers bearing on the theoretical, genetic, agricultural, medical and biodiversity issues. Emphasis is also placed on the selection of comprehensive, revisionary or integrated systematics studies of broader biological or zoogeographical relevance. In addition to full-length research articles and reviews, the journal publishes interpretive articles in a Forum section, Short Communications, and Letters to the Editor. The journal publishes reports on all phases of medical entomology and medical acarology, including the systematics and biology of insects, acarines, and other arthropods of public health and veterinary significance.

Announcement and Advertisement
Announcements regarding scientific activities such as conferences, symposium, are published for free. Advertisements can be either published or placed on website as banners.

Publisher
Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (IPS) , University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore Pakistan.
open access
Entomology and Applied Science Letters supports the submission of entomological papers that contain information of interest to a wider reader groups e. g. papers bearing on taxonomy, phylogeny, biodiversity, ecology, systematic, agriculture, morphology. The selection of comprehensive, revisionary or integrated systematics studies of broader biological or zoogeographical relevance is also important. Distinguished entomologists drawn from different parts of the world serve as honorary members of the Editorial Board. The journal encompasses all the varied aspects of entomological research.