Creative Commons License 2021 Volume 8 Issue 3

Fauna and Species Diversity of Ground Beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in Meadows


, , ,
Abstract

The species diversity of ground beetles (Carabidae) was studied in the meadow ecosystems in the center of European Russia (Nizhniy Novgorod region and the Republic of Mordovia). Seventeen localities were studied. All meadow biotopes were divided into four types: dry meadows, dry meadows adjacent to forest shelter-belts, wet floodplain meadows, and floodplain meadows affected by livestock grazing. The highest species diversity was in dry meadows adjacent to forest shelter-belts (65 species) and wet floodplain meadows (62 species). The lowest number of species was in floodplain meadows affected by livestock grazing (24 species). Forty ground beetle species have been identified in dry meadows. Wet floodplain meadows had the highest Shannon’s index, and the lowest Simpson index. The ground beetle fauna had high values of the Simpson and Berger-Parker indices in dry meadows. Only two species dominated in dry meadows, while four to seven species dominated in other habitats. According to the Jaccard similarity index, the most similar species composition of ground beetles was in dry meadows and dry meadows adjacent to forest shelter-belts. By reducing the number of species and specimens of ground beetles, trampling has a great effect on the fauna of floodplain meadows affected by livestock grazing.


How to cite this article
Vancouver
Ruchin A, Alekseev S, Khapugin A, Esin M. Fauna and Species Diversity of Ground Beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in Meadows. Entomol Appl Sci Lett. 2021;8(3):28-39. https://doi.org/10.51847/Nv94GSLSkN
APA
Ruchin, A., Alekseev, S., Khapugin, A., & Esin, M. (2021). Fauna and Species Diversity of Ground Beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in Meadows. Entomology and Applied Science Letters, 8(3), 28-39. https://doi.org/10.51847/Nv94GSLSkN

Fauna and Species Diversity of Ground Beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in Meadows

Alexander Ruchin1*, Sergei Alekseev2, Anatoliy Khapugin1, Mikhail Esin1

 

1Joint Directorate of the Mordovia State Nature Reserve and National Park «Smolny», Saransk, Republic of Mordovia, Russia.

2Ecological club «Stenus», Kaluga, Kaluga region, Russia.


ABSTRACT

The species diversity of ground beetles (Carabidae) was studied in the meadow ecosystems in the center of European Russia (Nizhniy Novgorod region and the Republic of Mordovia). Seventeen localities were studied. All meadow biotopes were divided into four types: dry meadows, dry meadows adjacent to forest shelter-belts, wet floodplain meadows, and floodplain meadows affected by livestock grazing. The highest species diversity was in dry meadows adjacent to forest shelter-belts (65 species) and wet floodplain meadows (62 species). The lowest number of species was in floodplain meadows affected by livestock grazing (24 species). Forty ground beetle species have been identified in dry meadows. Wet floodplain meadows had the highest Shannon’s index, and the lowest Simpson index. The ground beetle fauna had high values of the Simpson and Berger-Parker indices in dry meadows. Only two species dominated in dry meadows, while four to seven species dominated in other habitats. According to the Jaccard similarity index, the most similar species composition of ground beetles was in dry meadows and dry meadows adjacent to forest shelter-belts. By reducing the number of species and specimens of ground beetles, trampling has a great effect on the fauna of floodplain meadows affected by livestock grazing.

Keywords: Abundance, Fauna, Ground beetle, Meadows, Species.


INTRODUCTION

 

Meadows are a type of vegetation characterized by the dominance of perennial herbaceous plants, mainly cereals, and sedges, under conditions of sufficient or excessive moisture. The presence of stands and turf is a common feature for all meadows. By location, there are three main meadow groups. Continental meadows are located on plains outside river floodplains. They are divided into dry and lowland meadows. Floodplain meadows are located in river valleys; they are flooded during floods. Mountain meadows are located above the upper border of the forest. In different worldwide regions, meadows are rich in perennial plant species [1] including threatened [2] and invasive [3] ones. They provide areas for the inhabitation of birds [4], mammals [5, 6], reptiles [7], invertebrates [8-10], and others. The various meadow types have different abilities to recover after disturbance due to differences in carbon stock values [11, 12]. Since ancient times, meadows experienced exposure from human activities including unlimited grazing, plowing, afforestation, urbanization. It has resulted in a decline in areas covered by natural meadows [13].

Changes in open biocenoses (e.g. meadows, steppes, pastures) have been recently observed in many regions of the world [14-18]. The transformation of the vegetation cover has an ever-increasing impact on the ground beetle fauna in the biocenoses which are bioindicators of the ecosystem status [19-22]. These ground layer inhabitants of biogeocenoses are found in sufficient quantities in a wide variety of landscapes (open and closed), biocenoses including territories of various destruction degrees. In recent decades, the anthropogenic transformation of meadow ecosystems (annual grass fires, unreasonable plowing of land, significant grazing, uncontrolled haying, afforestation of fields and meadows) has shown high rates [23-26]. The process of environmental impact leads to the disruption of the natural habitat, the emergence of secondary forest communities, and, consequently, changes in the natural ranges of some ground beetle species and population structure [16, 27-32]. This study is aimed to investigate the meadow ecosystems’ ground beetle fauna in the center of European Russia.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Description of biotopes

All biotopes were divided into four types. The main criteria for their distinguishing were the moisture degree, the presence of forest or afforestation near the biotope (within 100 m), anthropogenic impact in the form of grazing farm animals.

I – Dry meadows. These habitats are grazed meadows and abandoned fields located at sites on dry sandy soils. A certain degree of aridity is expressed in such biotopes. The following plant species have been found in these habitats: Achillea millefolium L., Calamagrostis epigejos (L.) Roth, Bromus inermis Leyss., Trifolium arvense L., Trifolium pratense L., Artemisia vulgaris L., Lathyrus pratensis L., Leucanthemum vulgare (Vaill.) Lam., Matricaria matricarioides (Less.) Porter, Dactylis glomerata L., Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop., Agrimonia eupatoria L., Cichorium intybus L., Pimpinella saxifraga L., Astragalus danicus Retz., Fragaria viridis Weston, Carex spicata Huds.

II – Dry meadows adjacent to forest shelter-belts. These are similar to the previous type but these differ by presence of Betula-formed or mixed shelterbelts in 30–50 m apart of the meadows. The following plant species have been found in these habitats: Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop., Consolida regalis Gray, Matricaria matricarioides, Achillea millefolium, Calamagrostis epigejos, Bromus inermis, Thlaspi arvense L., Brassica rapa L., Polygonum aviculare L., Cyanus segetum Hill, Leucanthemum vulgare (Vaill.) Lam., Viola arvensis Murray, Phleum pratense L.

III – Wet floodplain meadows. They are located in floodplains of streams and small rivers on the relatively wet sandy and sandy-loam soils. The following plant species have been found in these habitats: Rumex confertus Willd., Taraxacum officinale (L.) Weber ex F.H.Wigg., Carex spicata Huds., Carex vulpina L., Agrimonia eupatoria L., Bromus inermis, Tussilago farfara L., Dactylis glomerata L., Cichorium intybus L., Stellaria media (L.) Vill., Echium vulgare L., Scorzoneroides autumnalis (L.) Moench, Trifolium hybridum L., Alchemilla sp., Scirpus sylvaticus L., Carex acuta L.

IV – Floodplain meadows affected by livestock grazing. These habitats are similar to the previous type. But IV type differs from type III by the higher ground compaction due to grazing impact on the soil and vegetation cover.

Scientific names were used according to The PlantList database (http://www.theplantlist.org/).

 

Collection methods

We collected the material using pitfall traps from April to September in 2009, 2010, 2014, 2019. They were represented by 0.5-liter cups with 4% formalin solution. There were ten traps in each locality, they were installed in one line with a distance of two to three meters between them. In total, we studied 17 localities located in the Nizhniy Novgorod region and the Republic of Mordovia (Figure 1). The study was conducted in each locality with only one line, consisting of ten traps.

 

a)