Earth has native milieu for fungi that cover individual kingdom since evolution. The Keratinophilic fungi are allied molds that produce the keratinase enzyme to degrade the keratinous materials in or on the soil. These saprophytic fungi also play a role as causative of superficial infections in the environment. In order to present study, three isolates of fungi were evaluated to determine the effect of physical conditions (temperature & pH) on fungal growth on keratinophilic species. They were grown in an inundated culture medium containing various parameters of temperature & pH variations. In the study, Among isolated species, all species Chrysosporium indicum showed the highest growth weight of dry mycelium at 15ºC to 35ºC temperature & pH 3. While another two remaining species show slime increased growth at 35ºC & 7pH. In the present study, the best growth was recorded at 25°C to 35°C and 5-7 pH. Usually too alkaline and too acidic solutions or too high and too low temperature are not favorable for the growth of fungi. The leading phenomena of keratinophilic fungi in Jaipur are possibly due to the certain environmental conditions.
Keywords: Arthoderma multifidium; Chrysosporium indicum; Fusarium solani; Keratinophilic; filamentous fungi
V. Sharma, T.K. Kumawat, A. Sharma, R. Seth, S. Chandra, Advances in microbiology, 2015, 5, 93-106.
A. Sharma, S. Chandra, M. Sharma, Mycoses, 2012, 55(5), 410-415.
B. Havlickova, A.C. Viktor, F. Markus, Mycoses, 2008, 51(4), 2–15.
R. Batia, and Ichhpujani, Medical Mycology. In: Essentials of Medical Microbiology, Jaypee Bro. Medi. Pub., 1994, pp-635-674.
V. Sharma, T.K. Kumawat, R. Seth, A. Sharma, Afri. J Micro. Res., 2015, 9(19), 1286-1293
L. Ajello, Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 1953, 21(1), 157-171.
L. Ajello, Science, 1956, 123(3209), 876-879.
C.L. Meier, J. Rapp, R.M. Bowers, M. Silman, N. Fierer, Soil Biol Biochem, 2010, 42(7), 1083–90.
A. Sharma, M. Sharma, S. Chandra, Ind J Fund Appl Life Sci, 2012, 2(4), 2231–6345.
R. Vanbreuseghem, Ann. Soc. Belg. Trop., 1952, 32, 173–178.
V.W. Cochrane, Physiology of Fungi, Wiley, New York. 1958, 524 pp.
M.D. Maranon, N. Chaudanson, N. Joly, P. Gervais, Biotechnol Bioeng., 1999, 65(2), 176.
N.J. Goldfarb, and F. Hermann, J Invest Dermatol, 1956, 27,193-201
P.M. Stockdale, Biological Reviews, 1953, 28(1), 84-104
C.C. Chi, W.R. Childers, E.W. Hanson, Phytopathology, 1964, 54, 434-436
H.M. Abdel-Fattah, A.H. Moubasher, S.M. Maghazy, mycopathologia, 1982, 79(1),49-53
Sharma, M. Ph.D. Thesis, Botany Department. Jaipur, India: University of Rajasthan, 1983.
V.C. Khilare, and R. Ahmed, International Journal of Advanced Biotechnology and Research, 2012, 2(1), 99-102
D.P. Llamas, M.D.C. Gonzalez, C.I. Gonzalez, C.R. Lopez, J.C.T. Marquina, Growth of Fusarium solani as affected by temperature and water potencial (NaCl and KCl) Interactions, Book of Abstract II Interational Conference of Enviromental an Applied Microbiology (BioMicroWorld 2007) Seville (Spain), 2 November ‐ 1 December
V.K. Gupta, A.K. Misra, R.K. Gaur, Journal of Plant Protection Research, 2010, 50(4), 452-462
J.N. Merlin, I.V.S. Nimal, N. Christhudas, K.P. Praveen, P. Agastian, Asian J Pharm Clin Res, 2013, 6(3), 98-103
S. Sharma, P. Sharma, R. Agrawal, Asian J Biochem Pharmaceut Res, 2011, 3(1), 2231–560.
T. Hashimoto, and C.D.R. Wu, Journal of Bacteriology, 1972, 112(2), 967-976
A.G. Knight, Clinical And Experimental Dermatology, 1976, 1(2), 159–162
S.K. Kadhima, J. K. Al-Janabia, A.H. Al-Hamadanib, J Contemp Med Sci, 2015, 1(3), 9-19