2016 Volume 3 Issue 5

An assessment of the response of 20 canola (Brassica napus L.) genotypes to drought stress during flowering

Ali Godarzi, Forood Bazrafshan, Mehdi zare, Hooshang Faraji, Ali Reza SafahaniLangeroodi

The present study was conducted to evaluate the canola (Brassica napus L.) Genotypes responses to drought stress and different growing conditions. According to this, 20 genotypes of canola were cultivated at two different regions and irrigated normally until flowering stage. The canola irrigation was cut at the flowering stage and canola genotypes sense drought stress from flowering stage until harvesting stage. In this experiment, the yield and yield components were recorded for all genotypes. Results showed that canola genotypes had a different response to drought stress. Moreover, it was observed that canola yield and also its yield components formation were significantly affected by interaction of genotype and growing conditions. The canola seed yield, number of silique per plant, seed number in silique, 1000-seed weight, seed oil content and oil yield was significantly reduced due to drought stress. It was found that 1000-seed weight had the highest effect on the canola seed yield formation, in comparison with other yield components. According to our results, it can be concluded that the canola response to drought stress was genotype-dependent. It was also concluded that 1000-seed weight could be a suitable trait for selection of the canola genotypes.


Key-words: Oil content, Canola yield, Oil content, Path analysis.


Adams, M. and Grafius, J. Crop science, 1971, 11, 33-35.

Ahmadi, A. and Ceiocemardeh, A.Iranian Agriculture Science J, 2004,35, 753-763.

Ahmadi, M. and Bahrani, M. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, 2009,5, 755-761.

Algan, N. and Aygun, H. ZIRAAT FAKULTESI DERGISI, 2001,38, 9-16.

Araus, J., Slafer, G., Reynolds, M. and Royo, C. Annals of Botany, 2002, 89:, 925-940.

Bannayan, M., Nadjafi, F., Azizi, M., Tabrizi, L. and Rastgoo, M. Industrial Crops and products, 2008,27, 11-16.

Champolivier, L. and Merrien, A. European Journal of Agronomy, 1996,5, 153-160.

Chaves, M. and Oliveira, M. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2004,55, 2365-2384.

Chaves, M.M., Maroco, J.P. and Pereira, J.S.Functional plant biology, 2003,30, 239-264.

Clarke, J. and Simpson, G. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 1978,58, 731-737.

Diepenbrock, W.Field Crops Research, 2000,67, 35-49.

Din, J., Khan, S., Ali, I. and Gurmani, A.J Anim Plant Sci,2011, 21, 78-82.

G Ghobadi, M., Bakhshandeh, M., Fathi, G., Gharineh, M.H., Alami-Said, K., Naderi, A. and Ghobadi, M.E. Journal of Agronomy, 2006, 5(2), 336-341.

Gómez-Campo, C. Biology of Brassica coenospecies, Elsevier, 1999.

Goyal SS, SK R. Crop production in saline environments, global and integrative perspectives, 2003.

Gunasekera, C., Martin, L., French, R., Siddigue, K. and Walton, G. Proceedings of the 22th Australian Agronomy conference, Geelong, 2003.

Henry, J. and MacDonald, K. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 1978,58, 303-310.

Iqbal, M., Akhtar, N., Zafar, S. and Ali, I.South African Journal of Botany, 2008,74, 567-571.

Jamieson, P., Martin, R. and Francis, G. New Zealand journal of crop and horticultural science, 1995,23, 55-66.

Jensen, C., Mogensen, V., Mortensen, G., Fieldsend, J., Milford, G., Andersen, M.N. and Thage, J. Field Crops Research, 1996,47, 93-105.

Kobata, T., Palta, J.A. and Turner, N.C. Crop Science, 1992,32, 1238-1242.

Krogman, K. and Hobbs, E.Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 1975,55, 903-909.

Ma, Q., Niknam, S.R. and Turner, D.W. Crop and Pasture Science, 2006,57, 221-226.

Maggio, A., De Pascale, S., Ruggiero, C. and Barbieri, G. European journal of agronomy, 2005,23, 57-67.

Mendham, N. J., and P. A. Salisbury. Physiology, crop development, growth and yield, 1995.

Morrison, M. Canadian Journal of Botany, 1993,71, 303-308.

Mou, B. and Kronstad, W.E.Crop Science, 1994,34, 833-837.

NeSmith, D. and Ritchie, J. Agronomy Journal, 1992,84, 107-113.

Nielsen, D.C. Journal of Production Agriculture, 1997,10, 307-313.

ÖZER, H., Oral, E. and DOĞRU, Ü.Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 1999, 23, 603-608.

Poma, I., Venezia, G. and Gristina, L. Proc. Proceedings of the 10th Internationl Rapeseed Congress, Canberra, Australia, 1999.

Rakow, G.. Species origin and economic importance of Brassica,Brassica, Springer,2004, 3-11.

Rao, G., Jain, A. and Shivanna, K. Annals of botany, 1992,69, 193-198.

Rao, M. and Mendham, N. The Journal of Agricultural Science,1991,117, 177-187.

Richards, R. and Thurling, N. Crop and Pasture Science,1978,29, 469-477.

Sabaghnia, N., Dehghani, H., Alizadeh, B. and Mohghaddam, M. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 2010, 356-370.

Sadaqat, H.A., Tahir, M.H.N. and Hussain, M.T. Int. J. Agric. Biol, 2003, 5, 611-614.

Saini, H. and Aspinall, D. Annals of Botany, 1981,48, 623-633.

Seifert, M. and Boelcke, B. Tagungsbericht, 1977,149, 183-193.

Shabani, A., Sepaskhah, A. and Kamgar-Haghighi, A. Int. J. Plant Prod, 2013, 7, 313-340.

Shannon, M. Breeding, selection, and the genetics of salt tolerance, 1984.

Shirani Rad, A. and Daneshian, J.Botany Society of America.(Abst), 2006.

Sinaki, J. M., E. Majidi, AH Shirani Rad, G. Noormohammadi, and G. Zarei. American J. of Agric. on Environ, 2007, 417-422.

Singh, P., Mishra, A. and Imtiyaz, M. Agricultural Water Management, 1991,20, 245-253.

Smith, C., Wright, G. and Woodroofe, M. Irrigation Science,1988,9, 15-25.

Tesfamariam, E.H., Annandale, J.G. and Steyn, J.M. Agronomy Journal, 2010,102, 658-666.

Tommey, A. and Evans, E. The Journal of Agricultural Science,1992, 118, 301-308.

Tuncturk, M. and Çiftçi, V. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 2007,39, 81.

Walton, G., Mendham, N., Robertson, M. and Potter, T. Proc. Proceedings of the 10th International Rapeseed Congress, Canberra, Australia, 1999.

Westgate, M.E. and Grant, D.L.T. Plant Physiology, 1989,91, 862-867.

Wright, P.R., Morgan, J., Jessop, R. and Cass, A. Field Crops Research, 1995,42, 1-13.

Entomology and Applied Science Letters is an international peer reviewed publication which publishes scientific research & review articles related to insects that contain information of interest to a wider audience, e.g. papers bearing on the theoretical, genetic, agricultural, medical and biodiversity issues. Emphasis is also placed on the selection of comprehensive, revisionary or integrated systematics studies of broader biological or zoogeographical relevance. Papers on non-insect groups are no longer accepted. In addition to full-length research articles and reviews, the journal publishes interpretive articles in a Forum section, Short Communications, and Letters to the Editor. The journal publishes reports on all phases of medical entomology and medical acarology, including the systematics and biology of insects, acarines, and other arthropods of public health and veterinary significance.
Issue 3 Volume 9 - 2022
Call for Papers
Entomology and Applied Science Letters supports the submission of entomological papers that contain information of interest to a wider reader groups e. g. papers bearing on taxonomy, phylogeny, biodiversity, ecology, systematic, agriculture, morphology. The selection of comprehensive, revisionary or integrated systematics studies of broader biological or zoogeographical relevance is also important. Distinguished entomologists drawn from different parts of the world serve as honorary members of the Editorial Board. The journal encompasses all the varied aspects of entomological research. This has become the need felt in scientific research due to the emphasis on intra-, inter-, and multi-disciplinary approach.