2014 Volume 1 Issue 4

Scanning electron microscopic observations on sensilla of Ixodes acutitarsus recovered from semi-wild cattle Bos frontalis Lambert.

Bhabesh Ronghang, Bishnupada Roy

Scanning electron microscopic observations on the body surface of the tick Ixodes acutitarsus recovered from semi-wild cattle Bos frontalis revealed the occurrence of fifteen different types of sensory structures. Dorsal side of the body have six types of sensilla like cuticular pit sensilla, sensilla basiconica type I, sensilla basiconica type II, sensilla chaetica type I, sensilla chaetica type II, and bifid sensilla. Whereas, ventral side of the parasite have seven types of sensilla namely sensilla chaetica type I, sensilla chaetica type III, coeloconic sensilla, sensilla trichodea type I, sensilla trichodea type II, sensilla trichodea type III and hair plate sensilla. In the anterior portion of the body, palps are provided with sensilla basiconica type III. In the first pair of legs Hallers organ is provided with four types of sensilla like sensilla chaetica type III, sensilla basiconica type III, multiporous sensilla type I and multiporous sensilla type II. Functional significance of the sensilla in the parasite is discussed.

Keywords: scanning electron microscopy, sensilla, Ixodes acutitarsus, Bos frontalis


S. Ghosh, G. C. Bansal, S. C. Gupta, D. Ray, M. Q. Khan, H. Irshad, M. D. Shahiduzzaman, U. Seitzer, J. S. Ahmed, Parasitol. Res., 2007, 101, s207-s216.

B. D. Perry, T. F. Randolph, J. J. Mcdermott, K. R. Sones, P. K. Thornton, International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya, 2002.

B. Minjauw, A. McLeod, Centre for Tropical Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, UK, 2003.

T. Krober, P. M. Guerin, J. Exp. Biol., 1999, 202, 1877-1883.

L. L. Chao, C. M. Shi, Exp. Appl. Acarol., 2012, 56, 159-164.

E. J. L. Soulsby, Helminths, arthropods and protozoa of domesticated animals, 7th edn. Bailliere Tindall, London, 1982, p 809.

E. H. Slifer, Entomol. News., 1960, 71, 179-182.

D. M. Olson, D. A. Andow, Int. J. Insect. Morphol. Embryol., 1993, 22, 507-520.

N. Isidoro, F. Bin, S. Colazza, S. B. Vinson, J. Hymen. Res., 1996, 5, 206-239.

T. B. Sridharan, S. Prakash, R. S. Chauhan, K. M. Rao, K. Singh, R. N. Singh, Int. J. Insect Morphol. Embryol., 1998, 4, 273-289.

E. O. Onagbola, H. Y. Fadamiro, G. N. Mbata, Biol. Control., 2007, 40, 222-229.

B. Roy, Riv. Parasit., 1996, 13, 313-323.

V. Lacher, Z. Vergl. Physiol., 1964, 48, 587-623.

S. R. Alim, F. E. Kurezewski, Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash., 1982, 84, 586-593.

S. Dey, R. N. K. Horroo, D. Wankhar, Micron., 1995, 26, 367-376.

B. Roy, S. Dey, and J. R. B. Alfred, J. Natcon., 2003, 15, 279-298 .

B. Ronghang, B. Roy, J. Adv. Micros. Res., 2014, 9, 1-5.

J. W. Amrine, R. E. Lewis, J. Parasitol., 1978, 64, 343-358.

H. Altner, L. Schaller-Selzer, H. Stetter, I. Wohlrab, Cell Tiss. Res., 1983, 234, 279-307.

M. A. K. Bleeker, H. M. Smid, A. C. V. Aelst, J.J.A.V. Loon, L. E. M. Vet, Microsc. Res. Techniq., 2004, 63, 266-273.

J. N. C. Van der pers, Entomol. Exp. Appl., 1981, 30, 181-192.

L. B. Vosshall, R. F. Stocker, Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 2007, 30, 505-533.

M. Ruchty, R. Romani, L. S. Kuebler, S. Ruschioni, F. Roces, N. Isidoro, C. J. Kleineidam, Arthropod Struct, Dev., 2009, 38, 195-205.

P. J. Albert, W. D. Seabrook, Can. J. Zool., 1973, 4, 443-448.

H. Altner, L. Prillinger, Int. Rev. Cytol., 1980, 67, 69-139.

J. N. C. Van der Pers, P. L. Cuperus, and C. J. Denotter, Int. J. Insect Morphol. Embryol., 1980, 9, 15-23.

M. J. Faucheux, Annales de la Société Entomologique de France., 1990, 26, 173-184.

R. V. Zacharuk, Annu. Rev. Entomol., 1980, 25, 27-47

S. Dey, S. Singh, J. Adv. Micros. Res., 2011, 6, 232-239.

D. Schneider, R. A. Steinbrecht, Symp. Zool. Soc. London., 1968, 23, 279-297.

F. Mochisuki, N. Sugi, T. Shibuya, Appl. Entomol. Zool., 1992, 27, 547-556.

B. Ronghang, B. Roy, Entomol. Appl. Sci. Lett., 2014, 1, 23-26.

A. Goldsmith, S. Dey, J. Kalita, P. Dutta, J. Adv. Micros. Res., 2012, 7, 199-207.

M. R. Barlin, S. B. Vinson, G. L. Piper, J. Morphol., 1981, 168, 97-108.

F. Chapman Advances in Insect Physiology, Academic Press Inc., London, 1982.

I. Said, J. Insect Physiol., 2003, 49, 857–872.

M. M. Saleh Al- Dawsary, Agric. Biol. J. N. Am., 2013, 4, 23-32.

Entomology and Applied Science Letters is an international peer reviewed publication which publishes scientific research & review articles related to insects that contain information of interest to a wider audience, e.g. papers bearing on the theoretical, genetic, agricultural, medical and biodiversity issues. Emphasis is also placed on the selection of comprehensive, revisionary or integrated systematics studies of broader biological or zoogeographical relevance. Papers on non-insect groups are no longer accepted. In addition to full-length research articles and reviews, the journal publishes interpretive articles in a Forum section, Short Communications, and Letters to the Editor. The journal publishes reports on all phases of medical entomology and medical acarology, including the systematics and biology of insects, acarines, and other arthropods of public health and veterinary significance.
Issue 2 Volume 7 - 2020
Call for Papers
Entomology and Applied Science Letters supports the submission of entomological papers that contain information of interest to a wider reader groups e. g. papers bearing on taxonomy, phylogeny, biodiversity, ecology, systematic, agriculture, morphology. The selection of comprehensive, revisionary or integrated systematics studies of broader biological or zoogeographical relevance is also important. Distinguished entomologists drawn from different parts of the world serve as honorary members of the Editorial Board. The journal encompasses all the varied aspects of entomological research. This has become the need felt in scientific research due to the emphasis on intra-, inter-, and multi-disciplinary approach.