This study was conducted to investigate the effect of different levels of sesame meal (SM) on performance, blood parameters and physiology characteristics of Japanese quail. One hundred eighty day-old Japanese quail chick were equally distributed into six treatments, three replicates per treatment 10 birds and reared to 42 days of age. The treatments consisted of SM0, SM10 and SM20 (%). The diet for SM0 treatment had no SM (control), while those for treatments SM10 and SM20 included 10 and 20 percentage of SM, respectively. Each dietary treatment was fed ad libitum to three replicate groups of 10 birds at the beginning of experimental period. Chicks and feed were weighed on days 10, 24 and 42 and carcass characteristics were measured on day 42. Results indicated that, daily weight gain, feed intake and feed efficiency weren’t significantly affected by experimental treatments. However, diet containing 20% SM improved the weight gain and feed conversion ratio of Japanese quail, numerically. As well as, diets containing SM no had the significantly affect on weight of gizzard and liver than control diet (p>0.05). Thus, SM can be used as an alternative feedstuff in quail’s diets, at inclusion levels up to 20% without negative effects on performance and carcass traits.
Key words: Physiology, Japanese quail, Performance, Sesame Meal.
Abdul Rahman, S. Y., Abdul-Majeed A. F and Alkatan, M. M. 2009. J. Vet. Sci. 23, 25-28.
AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. Vol. I. 15th Ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA.
Bell, D. E., Ibrahim A. A., Denton, G. W., Long, G. G and Bradley, G. L. 1990. Poult. Sci. 69, 157.
Daghir, N. J and Kevorkian, K. A. 1970. Limiting amino acids in sesame meal chick diets. Pp. 711-715 in Proc. 14th World’s Poult. Cong., Madrid. Spain.
Daghir, N. J. Ullah, M. F and Rottensten, K. 1967. Trop. Agric. 44, 235-242.
Dan, B. 2005. Sesame profile. Available on: http://www.Agmrc.org.
Farran, M. T. G. Uwayjan, A. M and Ashkarian, V. M. 2000. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 9, 453-459.
Forbes, J. M and Covasa, M. 1995. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 51, 149-165.
Hossain, M. A and Jauncey, K. 1989. Aqua-cult. Fish. Manage. 20, 155-268.
Jørgensen, H., Zhao X. Q., Knudsen, K. B and Eggum, B. 1996. Br. J. Nutr. 75, 379-395.
Maga, J. A. 1982. J. Agric. Food Chem. 30, 1-9.
Mamputu, M and Buhr, R. J. 1995. Poult. Sci. 74, 672-684.
NRC. 1994. Nutrient requirements of poultry. 9th Ed. National Academy Press. Washington. D.C.
Rama, Rao S. V., Raju, M. V. L .N., Panda, A. K., Poonam, N. S., Sunder, G. S. and Sharma R. P. 2008. Br. Poult. Sci. 49, 81-85.
Ravindran, V and Blair, R. 1992. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 48, 205-231.
SAS Institute. 1994. SAS User’s Guide: Statistics. 1994 Ed. Version 6.12. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
Steel, R. G. D and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. A Biometrical Approach. MC Graw-Hill, New York.
Yamauchi, K., Samanya, M., Seki, K., Ijiri, N and Thongwittaya, N. 2006. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 15, 266-273.
Yasar, S. 2003. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2, 75-82.